Skip to content
iLoveVideoEditor

Publisher video automation

Turn more stories into reviewable video, with editorial control intact.

Use a structured article input, keep source and attribution requirements visible, and send approved stories through a repeatable render path.

Start the recommended pathInspect technical implementation
A focused use-case page with a transparent estimate and a direct handoff to execution or implementation.

Input

{ "brief": "automated video for publishers", "format": "9:16" }

Start with a bounded input and keep personal answers out of the public URL.

Output

Input
Plan
Render

Define the editorial review checkpoint, output format, and delivery handoff before scaling article volume.

Scope the first workflow

See an operational estimate before integration.

Three non-PII answers produce a directional result and recommended next action.

Question 1 of 3

Instant result

250 videos/month can be modeled as one controlled pipeline.

This is a planning estimate, not a guaranteed ROI claim. Validate a representative output before scaling.

Manual hours

125.0 h

Hours saved

112.5 h

Estimated credits

83.33

Continue to the next step

How this estimate works

The calculator uses the shared credits contract: duration × FPS × width × height, normalized to one minute of 1080p30.
  • A 20-second 1080p30 render is used for the directional credit estimate.
  • Three minutes of review per output is used for the automated-workflow estimate.
  • Actual cost depends on resolution, duration, FPS, revisions, source quality, and plan pricing.

Updated 2026-08-04

Three implementation modes

Browser workflow

Validate one input and review a first output before integration work.

API and templates

Keep data, variables, and composition rules in a versioned contract.

Agent interface

Let a typed MCP client plan, inspect, and render with human review.

When this is not the right fit

  • Estimates are directional and depend on source quality, review time, and current pricing.
  • Private sources require an authenticated integration you control.
  • A generated draft still needs brand, rights, accessibility, and factual review.

Frequently asked questions

Can I start with one proof point?

Yes. The recommended path is one input, one template family, and one observed first render before scaling.

Where are technical details documented?

The developer portal owns the VideoJSON contract, templates, validation, cost estimate, and API examples.

Continue in the ecosystem

Run the workflow

Execute the next source-to-video step.

Use the prompt generator

Preview a structured brief before rendering.

Read the implementation

Inspect templates, validation, and API details.

Start with one automated video for publishers proof point.

Choose the smallest useful input, verify the result, and carry the same assumptions into the first render.

Continue to executionOpen the prompt path